London’s Courtauld Gallery, the largest collection of Impressionist paintings in the UK, has received backlash for posting “trigger warnings” next to some of its most famous pieces of art.
The warnings are intended to alert viewers to the potentially upsetting or controversial subject matter. However, one painting, Édouard Manet’s “A Bar at the Folies-Bergère,” has been labeled “misogynistic” due to the depiction of a female barmaid and the male gaze.
The painting was created in 1882 and is one of Manet’s last major works. It depicts a blonde French barmaid at a Parisian cabaret club gazing at the viewer, with a male customer appearing in the background of the painting in a mirror behind the bar. The gallery’s new panel states that the barmaid “appears as just another item in the enticing array on offer in the foreground: wine, champagne, peppermint liqueur, and British Bass beer, with its iconic red triangle logo.”
However, the warning label has caused controversy, with some critics accusing the gallery of “woke” politics and being misogynistic themselves. Art historian Ruth Millington told The Telegraph that the warning label “unwittingly centers the male gaze” and instead suggested a “fresh new label which invites viewers to imagine what the woman is thinking.”
The painting is not the only one to receive a trigger warning for misogyny. Paul Gauguin’s “Nevermore,” an 1897 Impressionist piece, has also been labeled as such. The panel accompanying the painting warns that the painting shows “one of several teenagers that he took on as ‘wives,'” and that “the widespread racist fantasy of Tahitian girls as sexually precocious led to their unabashed exploitation.”
The question remains whether art museums should be required to put trigger warnings on their masterpieces. The Courtauld Gallery defends its decision to do so, saying that it is intended to “open up discussions and start conversations.” However, the controversy surrounding the labeling highlights the difficulties of navigating potentially sensitive subject matter in the art world.
While some may argue that trigger warnings are necessary to protect viewers from the potentially upsetting subject matter, others argue that the warnings stifle artistic expression and limit artistic freedom. The debate around trigger warnings in the art world is likely to continue, as museums and galleries seek to navigate the complex issues surrounding sensitive subject matter in their collections.
As for the Courtauld Gallery, the controversy has certainly brought attention to its collection, which remains one of the most extensive and impressive in the world. Whether the trigger warnings will ultimately prove to be a positive addition to the gallery’s labeling system remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: art continues to provoke and challenge viewers, and the conversation around how to approach the sensitive subject matter is far from over.
Sources: AWM, Dailymail, Standard
Leave a Comment