Our country is very much divided, people are so far apart on issues that it seems almost impossible to bring them together. FOX News Political Commentator Tucker Carlson has a strong right-wing perspective that half of the country is not going to agree most if not all of the time. But people are different and where most accept this and move on, some can’t handle the fact that there are people like Tucker Carlson out there expressing a conservative opinion. Extreme Leftists from the New York Times are threatening Carlson and his family, as they are supposedly planning on publishing his new home address in order to shut him up.
“Last week the New York Times began working on a story about where my family and I live. As a matter of journalism, there is no conceivable justification for a story like that,” he revealed. “The paper is not alleging we’ve done anything wrong, and we haven’t. We pay our taxes. We like our neighbors. We’ve never had a dispute with anyone. So why is the New York Times doing a story on the location of my family’s house?”
“Well, you know why,” he said. “To hurt us, to injure my wife and kids so that I will shut up and stop disagreeing with them.”
Carlson said that the outlet reportedly planned to run the information in a report this week.
“Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run,” he insisted. “I called them today and I told them. But they didn’t care. They hate my politics. They want this show off the air. If one of my children gets hurt because of a story they wrote, they won’t consider it collateral damage. They know it’s the whole point of the exercise: to inflict pain on our family, to terrorize us, to control what we say.”
The New York Times tweeted in response saying that it wasn’t true.
“.@nytimes does not plan to publish Tucker Carlson’s residence, which Carlson was aware of before his broadcast tonight.
It could be that the NY Times backed off after Carlson exposed them for the heinous thing that they were about to do. They claim that he was running interference into a story that they had just released, where Carlson supposedly made advances at a reoccurring guest, and when she denied him, he decided not to have her on the show as much. That seems like a stretch on the NY Times’ part. Carlson was worrying for his family’s welfare not a frivolous claim by a disgruntled former guest, upset that she wasn’t getting as much airtime.
Leave a Comment