It is known that Twitter will shadowban those that they disagree with, which is primarily conservatives. But they have recently been going even further and censoring content they find to be “untrue,” which also appears to be conservative posts… So when Trump’s Press Secretary was locked out of her account over a post about Hunter Biden, there was no surprise, but this clear bias should not be allowed. Social media has become a big part of how people communicate and get their message out to the masses. So how is it right that Twitter is attacking a presidential campaign by blocking information sharing and thereby interfering with this presidential election?
“You can imagine, then, the seismic outrage that would be generated if Twitter or Facebook banned a URL of a major news organization offering a story that hurt Donald Trump.
Yet less than three weeks from a presidential election, perhaps the most vital platform for political news and debate has locked down the accounts of a presidential candidate’s press secretary, and of his official campaign, among others, at the behest of activists pretending to be journalists.”
Twitter has decided they will not allow a New York Post story about Hunter Biden and his dealings with a Ukrainian Energy Company. The article discusses an email where Hunter Biden set up executives with his Father, the Vice President of the United States at the time. But Twitter claims they are not allowing the article to be shared until they can verify it’s validity… Tell me that’s not biased.
Watch The Clip Below.
“Twitter claims it doesn’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing its platform to be used as distribution for possibly “illegally obtained materials.” Yet when a Daily Caller reporter offered evidence that Hunter’s laptop was obtained by a repair shop legally, Twitter suspended his account as well.
Even as Twitter was banning reporters from sharing the Post’s investigation, or even providing evidence of its veracity, it was allowing left-wing outlets such as the New York Times and Daily Beast to purportedly contextualize it.”
“By the way, as of yet, no one has really disputed the veracity of the Post’s reporting. Hunter has not claimed that those aren’t his pictures or his emails. Joe Biden hasn’t claimed that he didn’t meet Burisma execs who were using his son. Politico reports that “Biden’s campaign would not rule out the possibility that the former VP had some kind of informal interaction” with the Burisma executive.”
This is some top-notch BS here. Twitter is overstepping by not allowing everyone to share information freely. It would be understandable had the been banning tweets that are inciting violence or racist, but this is Libs refusing to accept that their presidential candidate may have abused his power.
Leave a Comment